<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Have I lost some space on my disk?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://askowen.info/2008/09/have-i-lost-some-space-on-my-disk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://askowen.info/2008/09/have-i-lost-some-space-on-my-disk/</link>
	<description>Your friendly neighbourhood geek</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:38:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChrisM</title>
		<link>http://askowen.info/2008/09/have-i-lost-some-space-on-my-disk/comment-page-1/#comment-2558</link>
		<dc:creator>ChrisM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://askowen.info/?p=345#comment-2558</guid>
		<description>Is it possible you&#039;ve got those the wrong way round, as in manufactures use 1,000 = 1K, as opposed 2^10=1K?

Also, I recently discovered that despite my moans in the past, if you wanted to be a real pedant then the disc/disk manufacturers are correct - 1024 bytes are apparently 1 kibibyte, 1024 kibibyte are a mebibyte and so on. http://www.iec.ch/zone/si/si_bytes.htm explains it far better than I can.

Mind you, its a bit like the hacker vs. cracker terminology debate - it doesn&#039;t matter how many people you tell that hackers are good people who write code for companies, and crackers are often evil, a tiny proportion of people use the phrases in that way...

Also, don&#039;t forget that actually formatting a disk, be it floppy/optical or hard drive, will always &#039;lose&#039; some more capacity, as the overheads from FAT/NTFS/etc. etc. (and other necessary parts like MBR in some cases) have to be taken into account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it possible you&#8217;ve got those the wrong way round, as in manufactures use 1,000 = 1K, as opposed 2^10=1K?</p>
<p>Also, I recently discovered that despite my moans in the past, if you wanted to be a real pedant then the disc/disk manufacturers are correct &#8211; 1024 bytes are apparently 1 kibibyte, 1024 kibibyte are a mebibyte and so on. <a href="http://www.iec.ch/zone/si/si_bytes.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.iec.ch/zone/si/si_bytes.htm</a> explains it far better than I can.</p>
<p>Mind you, its a bit like the hacker vs. cracker terminology debate &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t matter how many people you tell that hackers are good people who write code for companies, and crackers are often evil, a tiny proportion of people use the phrases in that way&#8230;</p>
<p>Also, don&#8217;t forget that actually formatting a disk, be it floppy/optical or hard drive, will always &#8216;lose&#8217; some more capacity, as the overheads from FAT/NTFS/etc. etc. (and other necessary parts like MBR in some cases) have to be taken into account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
